So... why not divulge my thoughts on gun rights?
Let's get started. I think guns are absolutely ridiculous.
Aside from sporting rifles for trap shooting, I think guns are insanely wrong. And unless the Taliban one day, miraculously, conquers our coastlines and comes running towards my home and my family, I plan to never even consider owning or using a gun.
Guns are meant to kill people. I'll say it again, guns are meant to KILL people. I see absolutely no intrinsic good in possessing a device designed for the sole purpose of killing another human being. Many argue that they are meant to protect people, but if presented with life-threatening situations, well, we can always resort to metal baseball bats or good old bare-knuckled fists. At least these "weapons" were created for better uses.
There you have it. My frank opinion on guns. If that really ticks anyone off, then I can certainly live with that. At least I can sleep well at night knowing that I'll go through my life never being presented with the chance to shoot anybody.
The United States Supreme Court ruled against a current ban on handguns in Washington, D.C. just days ago. I don't understand the gun culture of our country anymore (actually I never did). Conservatives are celebrating the ruling like the Pope just came to town, and President Bush is even applauding the ruling stating that it's wonderful that the justices stood up for the "sacredness" of gun rights.
Sacredness? Guns kill people, Mr. Bush. How could you possibly use the word "sacred" and "gun" in the same sentence?
Gun rights were certainly an important step towards establishing and preserving freedom in our great country... 250 years ago. However, I really believe our 2nd Amendment is outdated. As recorded on our Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment reads as such:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
What really bothers me is the operative word "necessary," closely followed by the specific phrase, "A well regulated Militia." I mean, come on... in 2008, with a strong state-run military and peace here on our homeland, I absolutely do not think guns are necessary to preserve the security of a free state. Furthermore, do the millions of gunholders in the United States really make up any form of "well regulated militias?"
Give me a break. Why are we fooling ourselves by following this archaic language word-for-word? Even the best written and thought-out statues need to be updated. Even the Bible shouldn't be read 100% literally like this.
Where's our common sense? Why the urgent and necessary need to keep and bear arms? Can we please amend this one day soon? I think times have changed since 1776.
And now, with the NRA jubilant and excited to fight for further relaxation of handgun bans across the country, including my old city, San Francisco, we can and should expect all hell to break loose. In the words of Washington, D.C.'s mayor: "I can promise you that Washington will certainly be less safe because of this ruling." The argument that gun advocates make about guns making us safe is such bullshit. That's like saying that wars are meant to put an end to all wars. That's like saying that legalizing marijuana cuts down on crime and enhances personal freedom. These are very, very lousy examples of ends justifying the means.
When I speak out against gun rights to my gun-advocate friends, they often respond with: "Well, Justin, what if someone robbed your house and threatened to hold your family at gunpoint? Shouldn't you have the right to bear arms and defend yourself?"
Valid point. A handgun might just be justified in such an instance. But my response is and continues to be: "What are the chances of that happening?"
There is a lot of hate, violence and greed in our world and there always will be. But I've been alive for nearly 26 years now, which equates to a bit less than 9,500 days. Not one minute in one of those days have I ever felt threatened enough to desire a gun. Just the same, I think I can go 9,500 more days and 20,000+ days beyond that without needing a gun either.
But what if...
What if someone does rob my home one day and threatens my family at gunpoint? I can hope for-- perhaps one final time-- an all-loving and merciful God waiting on the other side. I can hope for a streak of conscience to somehow hit our attacker. But there are two thing I would be certain about. One is that I will clench my fists and fight 'till the death, and the other is that at least those left behind might know of a Justin Knabb that was a man of peace -- true to his word and morals.
I just fail to understand why so many people in our country wouldn't feel the same way. Why do they put so much energy and emotion into securing their right to bear arms? Shouldn't we be more focused on solving and preventing the causes of violence rather than continuing to patch these problems up with our selfish need for more guns?
What if our friends running the NRA used this energy to help feed the millions of hungry people in Africa instead? What if they used their abundant funds to build up scholarships so kids can get off the streets and get college educations instead? What if they encouraged people to recycle their no-good guns and build steel monuments of peace and reconciliation?
Unfortunately, these advocates are not part of any solution for peace and unity at all. I feel that guns represent all that is wrong with our country and unfortunate still, the NRA only seems to be growing in strength. Sure, people that want guns will always be able to acquire guns, whether they are readily available or restricted to black market trade. But we must not overlook the countless, senseless deaths from gun accidents and violence each year. We must offer and maintain incentives for putting our guns down and promoting peace and unity.